Untitled Page

Whilst Albert Einstein gave us e=mc2 in 1905 and the Theory of Relativity in 1915, he unfortunately failed to achieve his ambition to find a ‘theory of everything’ before he died.
Hermann Bondi, Thomas Gold, and Sir Fred Hoyle, who proposed the Steady State Theory in 1948, also failed to find a theory of everything.
Today the dominant theory of the universe is the Big Bang, a theory involving complex mathematical equations that are beyond most of us to understand. Accordingly, in order to form a picture of what they mean, much of this theory must be take on trust, with all due deference to the expertise of those who promote it.
Different View presents an alternative picture – one which illustrates exactly what is proposed: the universe as a constant circulation of locked-in energy, trapped inside the circle-diameter relationship, with the natural magnification surrounding straight-line velocity.
Logically there is nothing magical about space. Accordingly, in order to explain space, it must be subject to laws that are fundamentally no different to those that apply here on earth, albeit operating on a different level of magnitude. Accordingly, I am positing the view that the cosmos can be understood clearly and accurately in terms of basic geometry and simple arithmetic.
However, this is only possible to comprehend if it is based on the relationships found in its circles and their diameters that are perceived as ratios and fractions, as opposed to decimalised long division, a process of calculation that loses all sense of the relationship as to how the universe was formed.
The drawings and text in this book focus in on the diameter-circle relationship and posit the view that triangulation produces vortices in this spherical space-time continuum, leaving energy rotating in its own circulation of time, manifesting in the spherical surrounds of magnification found in acceleration-velocity.
It is pointed out that the compiling of this theory has required a level of education that could both see its complications and simplicities. It is hoped that the drawings and text that introduce this theory will provide adequate insight for readers to exchange views and comments.


	The Theory of Everything Whilst Albert Einstein gave us e=mc2 in 1905 and the Theory of Relativity in 1915, he unfortunately failed to achieve his ambition to find a ‘theory of everything’ before he died. Hermann Bondi, Thomas Gold, and Sir Fred Hoyle, who proposed the Steady State Theory in 1948, also failed to find a theory of everything. Today the dominant theory of the universe is the Big Bang, a theory involving complex mathematical equations that are beyond most of us to understand. Accordingly, in order to form a picture of what they mean, much of this theory must be take on trust, with all due deference to the expertise of those who promote it. Different View presents an alternative picture – one which illustrates exactly what is proposed: the universe as a constant circulation of locked-in energy, trapped inside the circle-diameter relationship, with the natural magnification surrounding straight-line velocity. Logically there is nothing magical about space. Accordingly, in order to explain space, it must be subject to laws that are fundamentally no different to those that apply here on earth, albeit operating on a different level of magnitude. Accordingly, I am positing the view that the cosmos can be understood clearly and accurately in terms of basic geometry and simple arithmetic. However, this is only possible to comprehend if it is based on the relationships found in its circles and their diameters that are perceived as ratios and fractions, as opposed to decimalised long division, a process of calculation that loses all sense of the relationship as to how the universe was formed. The drawings and text in this book focus in on the diameter-circle relationship and posit the view that triangulation produces vortices in this spherical space-time continuum, leaving energy rotating in its own circulation of time, manifesting in the spherical surrounds of magnification found in acceleration-velocity. It is pointed out that the compiling of this theory has required a level of education that could both see its complications and simplicities. It is hoped that the drawings and text that introduce this theory will provide adequate insight for readers to exchange views and comments.